Moore v. McPherson’s Empirical Analysis
1920
Citation profile
2 district · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently February 2012 · most notably McFall v. Ford (1931), Hoffman v. Hoffman (1943)
2 district · 26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Norton v. Reardon · Martindale v. Battey · Carter v. Hyatt · Capital Bank v. Huntoon · State ex rel. Noble v. Langmade
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is .settled law that after the term the court has no control over a judgment; it is then res judicata, subject only to the right of appeal and to the right of petition for a vacation of the judgment on any of the particular grounds (and no others) specified in section 596 of the civil code.” (Citing many cases.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““The only way the bank could protect itself was by seeing to it that the property sold for some figure approximating what it was worth, or for enough to satisfy its second lien.” (p. 273.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McFall v. Ford
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.