Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 KAN 536 - In re Ball

In re Ball’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
12
states following
February 2009
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently February 2009

22 state decisions — followed in 12 states

180192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Tinder & Smith · Cæsar v. State · Ex parte McCrary · State v. Johnston · Adams v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * All persons shall before conviction be bailable by sufficient sureties, except for capital offenses when the proof is evident or the presumption great; * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The court are of opinion that since the abolition of capital punishment in this state, persons charged with murder are in all cases bailable.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.