Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 KAN 59 - Jackman v. Lawrence Drilling & Development Co.

Jackman v. Lawrence Drilling & Development Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
July 2008
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2008

10 state decisions

30192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wooddell v. Allbrecht · Zeiner v. Edgar Zinc Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““That the said party of the second part shall surrender this lease to said party of the first part at any time upon payment of $50.00 or a good and sufficient quitclaim deed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.