Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 Md. App. 642 - Felder v. State

106 Md. App. 642 - Felder v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Moten v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In a desperate effort to keep the trial traffic flowing, we encourage a trial judge to warn a defendant in stern terms that he may be forced to trial without a lawyer if he fails to make timely efforts to obtain one. To reverse the trial judge in this case would be to teU judges generally that their stem, words are, when push comes to shove, a meaningless bluff. We would be telling them that in their efforts to keep a beleaguered production line moving they may admonish litigants about the penis of failing to adhere to time limits, but that they are then powerless to back up their words with action. We decline to do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.