Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 N.C. App. 172 - Beaver v. Hampton

106 N.C. App. 172 - Beaver v. Hampton’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
April 2003
most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Austin Products Co. v. Workers' Compensation Insurers Rating Association of Minnesota · Worthington v. Bynum · McEwen v. City of Norman · Collins v. Wayne Corp. · State v. Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he trial court erred in failing to award prejudgment interest on the $25,000 paid by the liability carrier from the filing date until it was paid by the liability carrier on 30 March 1989. Regarding the remaining $5,000, prejudgment interest should be taxed from the date of filing to the time of judgment as a cost, less any interest already paid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““[a] motion in limine is insufficient to preserve for appeal the question of the admissibility of evidence if the [movant] fails to further object to the evidence at the time it is offered at trial.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.