106 N.C. App. 635 - Gardner v. Gardner’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
January 1994
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“id., and it accordingly reversed the trial court. Judge Eagles dissented on the grounds that plaintiff did not observe and was not in close proximity to the negligent act and therefore”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gardner v. Gardner“failed to establish sufficient proximity to satisfy the foreseeability requirements of Ruark.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gardner v. Gardner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.