Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 NEB 48 - Thiede v. State

Thiede v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1921

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
9
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently June 2019

1 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

501921193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schultz v. State · Potter v. State · People v. Pearne · People v. Barnes · Commonwealth v. Adams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We believe the rule to be that, though the act, made unlawful by statute, is an act merely malum prohibitum and is ordinarily insufficient, still, when such an act is accompanied by negligence or further wrong, so as to be, in its nature, dangerous, or so as to manifest a reckless disregard for the safety of others, then it may be sufficient to supply the wrongful intent essential to criminal homicide, and, when such act results in the death of another, may constitute involuntary manslaughter. “Such an unlawful act alone, unaccompanied by negligence, is insufficient. (Citing cases.)” (pp. 53, 54.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * for, if the party furnishing the liquor knows, or was apprised of such facts that he should have known, of the danger, there then appears from his act a recklessness which is indifferent to results.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.