Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 Nev. 155 - State v. Babayan

State v. Babayan’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
2
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

52 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably Smith v. Eighth Judicial District Court of State of Nevada (1997), Jordan v. State Ex Rel. Department of Motor Vehicles & Public Safety (2005)

52 state decisions

1801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Dionisio · 15 Cal. 3d 248 - Johnson v. Superior Court · United States v. Fields · United States v. Gold · United States v. Lawson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “dismissal with prejudice at the state level is most appropriate upon a finding of aggravated circumstances and only after a balancing of its deterrent objectives with the interest of society in prosecuting those who violate its laws.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “dismissal without prejudice will remedy the derelictions in the absence of an irremedial evidentiary taint or prejudice to the defendant's case on the merits”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[Ole grand jury should have had [the] information before it in order for it to make an informed determination”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.