Buschauer v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently October 2020 · most notably Harris v. State (1993), Summers v. State (2006)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Booth v. Maryland · 7 Cal. 3d 666 - People v. Chambers · Silks v. State · State v. Zuck · 548 So. 2d 562 - Ex Parte Hinton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in the commission of a crime”-—indicates that the instrumentality must be used in conscious furtherance of a crime); State v. Chouinard, 93 N.M. 634 , 603 P.2d 744, 745 (1979) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Harris v. State · State v. Williams“[T]his court will narrowly construe penal statutes where they are ambiguous.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Before imposing sentence the court shall afford the victim an opportunity to: (a) Appear personally or by counsel; and (b) Reasonably express any views concerning the crime, the person responsible, the impact of the crime on the victim and the need for restitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Randell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.