In re Friedman’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 1991
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jewish Center of Sussex Cty. v. Whale · In Re Pennica · Matter of Kushner · In Re Infinito · In Re Verdiramo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]his record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that respondent was knowingly part of a scheme with others to defraud insurance companies. Neither does it establish that respondent knowingly permitted false information to be supplied to these insurance companies in an attempt to obtain money from them. [Matter of Friedman, supra, 106 N.J. at 7 ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Matter of Power
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.