Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 N.M. 36 - Fenner v. Fenner

Fenner v. Fenner’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably Santa Fe Exploration Co. v. Oil Conservation Commission (1992), Enriquez v. Cochran (1998)

31 state decisions

2401987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sarah Fall v. Elizabeth Eastin · Lee v. Lee · Matter of Adoption of Doe · 49 Cal. 2d 322 - Rozan v. Rozan · Wagner Land and Investment Co. v. Halderman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e caution [appellant’s] counsel regarding violations of our appellate rules. [Appellant] provided no citations to the parts of the record and transcript he relied on, a violation of SCRA 1986, 12-213(A)(1)(c) and (A)(2). Technically, we have no duty to entertain any of [appellant’s] contentions on appeal due to this procedural violation. See Bilbao v. Bilbao, 102 N.M. 406 , 696 P.2d 494 (Ct.App.1985). [Appellant’s] counsel also failed to provide case authority for several of his issues, a violation of Rule 12-213(A)(3). We remind counsel that we are not required to do his research. In re Adoption of Doe [, 100 N.M. 764 , 676 P.2d 1329 (1984) ]. We will not review issues raised in appellate briefs and unsupported by cited authority. Id.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.