Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 N.M. 391 - State v. Cheadle

State v. Cheadle’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
October 2021
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently October 2021

20 state decisions

8019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · United States v. DiFrancesco · Pennsylvania v. Goldhammer · United States v. Earley · State v. Baros

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “neither DiFrancesco nor Goldhammer overrules our decisions in Baros, Verdugo or Allen, and ... as a result it is still improper for a trial court in New Mexico to “set aside a valid sentence after a defendant has been committed thereunder, and impose a new or different sentence increasing the punishment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.