Ortiz v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2003
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wooley v. Maynard · State v. Bell · State v. Gunzelman · State v. Puga
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“For you to find the defendant guilty of incest as charged in Count_, the state must prove to your satisfaction beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following elements of the crime: 1. The defendant had sexual intercourse ' with_; 2. That_was the daughter of the defendant; 3. This happened in New Mexico on or about the_day of__”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hargrove
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.