State v. Hensel’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
37 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently June 2014 · most notably State v. Hodge (1994), State v. Altgilbers (1989)
37 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rakas v. Illinois · United States v. Matlock · Stoner v. California · Chapman v. United States · State v. Donaldson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]here important facts are to be determined by the factfinder and the burden of proof is on the state, it would be fundamentally unfair to allow the state to prove such facts on purely hearsay evidence, denying the accused the opportunity to cross-examine the declarant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Roybal · State v. Rivera“doctrine. See State v. Hensel, 106 N.M. 8 , 738 P.2d 126 (Ct.App.) (trial court will be affirmed on appeal if right for any reason), cert. denied, 105 N.M. 720 , 737 P.2d 79 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 958 , 108 S.Ct. 358 , 98 L.Ed.2d 383 (1987). The”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ybarra
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.