Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

106 Ohio App. 3d 246

665 N.E.2d 1137

State v. Nobles

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 1, 1995

This page is marked noindex.

Ohio Court of Appeals · decided 1995-09-01

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-09-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably 149 Ohio App. 3d 717 - In Re Baby Girl Doe (2002), State v. Whitaker (2022)

3 federal appellate · 64 state decisions

3701995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

*282 Grady, Judge,

¶1 dissenting in part.

¶2 I agree that the corpus delicti rule required the state to prove by evidence independent of Nobles’s confession that she had “treat[ed] a human corpse in a way that would outrage reasonable community standards.” However, absent the confession, there is no evidence, direct or' circumstantial, demonstrating how Nobles might have concealed or disposed of her son’s body. On that record a jury could not find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the standards of a reasonable community would be outraged by Nobles’s treatment of her son’s corpse. I would sustain the second assignment of error in that respect, but would overrule the assignment and affirm the conviction of murder for the reasons explained by Judge Young.

/106/ohioapp3d/246 · .json · Public domain