106 Ohio App. 3d 433 - State v. Levingston’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently January 2026
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Jenks · 16 Ohio App. 3d 313 - State v. Flowers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under Ohio law * * * circumstantial evidence can have the same probative value as direct evidence, and '[a] conviction can be sustained based on circumstantial evidence alone.' "). Ultimately, the record contains sufficient circumstantial evidence to support the trial court's conviction and denial of appellant's Crim.R. 29 motion for acquittal. Nos. 15AP-131 and 15AP-132 5 Moreover, we have held that "[t]here is a reasonable inference that one who forcibly enters a dwelling, or a business place, does so with the intent to commit a theft offense in the absence of circumstances giving rise to a different inference.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kellogg
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.