106 Ohio App. 3d 605 - Aretz v. Rue’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2015
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Dehass · Seasons Coal Co. v. City of Cleveland · C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co. · Strother v. Hutchinson · Myers v. Garson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In this case, Ramon Aretz was the victim of a rear-end collision. Even if we were to assume, for purposes of argument, that he was negligent in the way he secured the television set in his van, he was not legally obligated to anticipate that he would be the victim of a rear-end collision. The accident was entirely the fault of the appellee.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.