106 Ohio App. 3d 673 - Evans v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Dasilva v. Dasilva, Unpublished Decision (10-17-2005) (2005), Stan v. Stan, Unpublished Decision (10-20-2003) (2003)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blakemore v. Blakemore · Stores Realty Co. v. City of Cleveland · Bechtol v. Bechtol · Reichert v. Ingersoll · 68 Ohio App. 3d 287 - Arthur Young & Co. v. Kelly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“role (see R.C. 3109.04 (F)(1)(c)). Appellant's Brief at 15-16. {¶ 40} We first note that there is no requirement that a trial court separately address each factor enumerated in R.C. 3109.04 . In re Henthorn , Belmont App. No. 00-BA-37, 2001-Ohio-3459 . Absent evidence to the contrary, an appellate court will presume the trial court considered all of the relevant”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.