Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 OHIOMISC2D 72 - State v. Namay

State v. Namay’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Katz v. United States · Payton v. New York · Whren v. United States · Mincey v. Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “strictly circumscribed by the exigencies which justify its initiation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.