Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 OHIOST3D 185 - Comer v. Risko

Comer v. Risko’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

312
cited by 312 later decisions
2
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

309 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 312 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Hudson v. Petrosurance, Inc. (2010), City of Sharonville v. American Employers Insurance (2006)

309 state decisions

2130200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cooper v. Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati, Inc. · Albain v. Flower Hospital · 141 Ohio St. 584 - Johnson v. Wagner Provision Co. · Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Trowbridge · 136 Ohio St. 183 - Losito v. Kruse, Jr.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 312 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) [n]o genuine issue as to any material fact remains to be litigated; (2) the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law; and (3) it appears from the evidence that reasonable minds can come to but one conclusion, and viewing such evidence most strongly in favor of the party against whom the motion for summary judgment is made, that conclusion is adverse to that party.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “de novo, governed by the standard set forth in Civ.R. 56.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a direct claim against a hospital premised solely upon negligence of an agent who cannot be found liable is contrary to basic agency law.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.