Lytle v. Fulotka’s Empirical Analysis
1925
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1975
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McIntosh v. Holtgrave · Allison v. Crummey · Johnson v. Furchtbar · Tootle v. Payne · Berry v. Tolleson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The five years statute of limitations against recovery of lands sold at judicial sale, saving to minors three years after removal of disability, does not apply to actions commenced by restricted Indians for the recovery of their restricted lands.”.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dierks v. Isaac
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.