State v. McInally’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 117 Wash. 2d 829 - State v. Lord · 110 Wash. 2d 528 - State v. Miller · 116 Wash. 2d 563 - Badgett v. Security State Bank · State v. Bobic · 122 Wash. 2d 738 - Kramarevcky v. Department of Social & Health Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[N]otice of cross-review is essential if the respondent `seeks affirmative relief as distinguished from the urging of additional grounds for affirmance.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sims“The State is entitled to argue any grounds to affirm the court's decision that are supported by the record, and is not required to cross-appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sims
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.