Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 S.C. 220 - State v. Freeland

State v. Freeland’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2017

6 state decisions

1019161920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Park v. Laurens Cotton Mills · Reynolds v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he instruction was really too favorable to defendant, in that it did not eliminate the possibility of willful or negligent want of knowledge. If she was culpably ignorant of the fact, her ignorance would not excuse her.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.