Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 SO3D 495 - Hamil v. State

Hamil v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · Delno v. Market St. Ry. Co. · 761 So. 2d 269 - Robinson v. State · 840 So. 2d 1040 - State v. Partlow · 611 So. 2d 1250 - Simmons v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is 'within the trial judge's province, when acting as trier of both fact and law, to determine the weight of the evidence, evaluate conflicting evidence, and determine the credibility of the witnesses, and such determinations may not be disturbed on appeal unless shown to be unsupported by competent and substantial evidence, or to constitute an abuse of discretion.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.