Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 SO3D 557 - Thomas v. Roberts

Thomas v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Borel v. Young · 635 So. 2d 177 - Chance v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. · 921 So. 2d 1219 - In Re Succession of McKay · Aucoin v. Lakewood Medical Center · 994 So. 2d 120 - In Re Succession of James

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A child may institute an action to prove paternity even though he is presumed to be the child of another man. If the action is instituted after the death of the alleged father, a child shall prove paternity by clear and convincing evidence. For purposes of succession only, this action is subject to a peremptive period of one year. This peremptive period commences to run from the day of the death of the alleged father.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.