Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 SO3D 845 - Pearson v. Browning

Pearson v. Browning’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc. · 493 So. 2d 933 - Bryant, Inc. v. Walters · Duvall v. Duvall · Leaf River Forest Products, Inc. v. Deakle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “She further argues the filing was governed by and complied with the service requirements of Rule 5 of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure. However, Ruby's”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Calling a 'petition for contempt' a 'motion' and using motion procedures with contempt actions is incorrect according to Rule 81.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “Id. (citing Sanghi v. Sanghi , 759 So.2d 1250 , 1256 (¶ 30) (Miss. Ct. App. 2000) ).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.