Ashbrook v. Hammer’s Empirical Analysis
1937
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 1988
2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fischer v. Britton · 45 Tex. Civ. App. 406 - Pearce v. Dyess · Adams v. First Nat. Bank of Waco · Western Grocery Co. v. K. Jata & Co. · Smyth v. Caswell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`Conversion' is the unlawful and wrongful exercise of dominion, ownership, or control by one person over property of another to exclusion of exercise of the same rights by owner, either permanently or for an indefinite time, * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Minter v. Sparks
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.