Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 SW3D 103 - Wallace v. State

Wallace v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

50 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Reyes v. State · Jordan v. State · Keeter v. State · Loesch v. State · Martinez v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the newly discovered evidence was unknown to him at the time of trial; (2) his failure to. discover the new evidence -was not due to his lack of due diligence; (3) the new evidence is admissible and not merely cumulative, corroborative, collateral, or impeaching; and (4) the new evidence is probably true aiid will probably bring about a different result in a new trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “by denying [the defendant] a hearing on his motion for new trial, the trial court abdicated its fact finding function and effectively prevented [the defendant] from making a record sufficient to challenge on appeal the policy about which he complains”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A new trial shall be granted an accused where material evidence favorable to the accused has been discovered since trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.