Wallace v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
50 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Reyes v. State · Jordan v. State · Keeter v. State · Loesch v. State · Martinez v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the newly discovered evidence was unknown to him at the time of trial; (2) his failure to. discover the new evidence -was not due to his lack of due diligence; (3) the new evidence is admissible and not merely cumulative, corroborative, collateral, or impeaching; and (4) the new evidence is probably true aiid will probably bring about a different result in a new trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Espinoza v. State“by denying [the defendant] a hearing on his motion for new trial, the trial court abdicated its fact finding function and effectively prevented [the defendant] from making a record sufficient to challenge on appeal the policy about which he complains”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Garcia v. State“A new trial shall be granted an accused where material evidence favorable to the accused has been discovered since trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Delamora v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.