106 Tex. 439
183 S.W 1144
Decided June 10, 1914
Texas Supreme Court · decided 1914-06-10
Ward sued Walker and others for specific performance of a contract, and appealed from a judgment in favor of all the defendants. The judgment was affirmed as to part of the defendants, but reversed as to three of them and remanded with instructions to enter judgment for plaintiff. These appellants then sought writ of error on the ground that the judgment settled the case.
Decided 1914-06-10
¶1ON MOTION ‘FOR REHEARING.
¶2delivered the opinion of the court.
¶3Hpon our original consideration of the petition for writ of error in *440this case it was erroneously marked “dismissed for want of jurisdiction.” This did not correctly represent our action on the petition, it-being our purpose to refuse the writ. The motion for rehearing is accordingly granted for the purpose of the proper entry being made in the case, the petition for writ of error being refused.