Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 U.S. 342 - Ames v. Quimby

Ames v. Quimby’s Empirical Analysis

106 U.S. 342 · 1882

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
March 1933
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1933 · most notably Vicksburg v. Putnam (1886), Panama Co v. Napier Shipping Co (1897)

14 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

110188218901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ames v. Quimby · Curran v. Rogers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The plaintiff, where the quality of goods which he furnished at a given •time to the defendant is in question, may show the good quality of like arti cíes furnished at the same time by him to another party, if he further shows that shoes he furnished to each party were of the same kind and quality.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.