Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 106 U.S. 629 - United States v. Harris

United States v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

106 U.S. 629 · 1882

Citation profile

560
cited by 560 later decisions
98
cited 98 times by the Supreme Court
20
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

196 federal appellate · 70 district · 59 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 560 later decisions (98 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2022 · most notably Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. (1970), Monroe v. Pape (1961)

196 federal appellate · 70 district · 59 state decisions — followed in 20 states

740188218901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on M'Culloch v. State of Maryland · Gibbons v. Ogden · United States v. Cruikshank · Slaughter-House Cases the Butchers' Benevolent Association of New Orleans v. The Crescent City Live · Paul v. Virginia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 560 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.””
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The duty of protecting all its citizens in the enjoyment of an equality of rights was originally assumed by the States and it remains there.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “depriv[e] ... any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.