State v. Eberhart’s Empirical Analysis
1919
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2002
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McCarty v. State · American Manganese Co. v. Virginia Manganese Co. · State v. Butman · Philips v. Christian County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it is not easy to understand why they were not mentioned, or why the intent was left to be discovered by implication.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Coria“9 Ruling Case Law, p. 1281. . . . . If it was the legislative intent to include partners in the statute ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Coria“the title to the property would be in another.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.