Daniel v. Daniel’s Empirical Analysis
1919
Citation profile
2 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 1949
2 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 14 E.H. Smith 330 - Reed v. . McCord · Hewett v. Dole · Crodle v. Dodge · Gordon v. Hillman · Leake v. Hayes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where one tenant in common enters upon' the common estate which in its then condition yields no profit, and so improves it as to make it productive, he is entitled to all of the profits produced by means of his- improvements. Leake v. Hayes, 13 Wash. 213 , 43 Pac. 48 , 52 Am. St. 34. And also when the profits are the result of the individual labors of the tenant in possession, and no demand for an accounting has been made, an accounting will not be decreed. Crodle v. Dodge, 99 Wash. 121 , 168 Pac. 986 . But the general rule is to the contrary, the instances where an accounting is refused being exceptions to and not expressive of the general rule. Eckert v. Schmitt, 60 Wash. 23 , 110 Pac. 635 ; Schuster v. Schuster, 84 Neb. 98 , 120 N. W. 948 , 29 L. R. A. (N. S.) 224; 18 Ann. Cas. 1078, and notes.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.