106 Wash. 2d 417 - State v. Binder’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 1988
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Sanwick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the State must prove the existence of prior convictions only by a preponderance of the evidence; (2) the State need not prove the constitutional validity of prior guilty pleas, though a facially invalid plea cannot be used; and (3) once the State presents an order of judgment and sentence bearing the defendant's name, identity is sufficiently established unless the defendant declares under oath that he is not the person named.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“separate consideration of multiple prior convictions served concurrently unless the convictions encompass the same conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.