106 Wash. 2d 525 - State v. Oxborrow’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
116 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 121 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2019 · most notably Blakely v. Washington (2004), 109 Wash. 2d 207 - State v. Dunaway (1988)
116 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77Q (§ 17 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 7 U.S.C. § 6O
Relies on 79 Wash. 2d 12 - State Ex Rel. Carroll v. Junker · 106 Wash. 2d 514 - State v. Nordby · State v. Evans · 106 Wash. 2d 547 - State v. Armstrong · State v. Norton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 121 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“clearly unreasonable, i.e., exercised on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons, or an action that no reasonable person would have taken.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“the sentencing court's decision regarding length of an exceptional sentence should not be reversed as 'clearly excessive' absent an abuse of discretion.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“(a) Either that the reasons supplied by the sentencing judge are not supported by the record which was before the judge or that those reasons do not justify a sentence outside the standard range for that offense; or (b) that the sentence imposed was clearly excessive or clearly too lenient.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.