State v. Trickler’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “It would appear that applying that simple test, as I suggested in the illustration, that when one item is found among an entire series or larger set of stolen items or allegedly stolen items, that it tends to make the determination of the issue of knowledge more probable than it would be without the evidence.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Trickler

2. “Now, the final thing we have to look at is an application of rule 403. That is the rule that indicates that some matters, although they are relevant, may be highly relevant, are excludable because, on balance, they involve issues of unfair prejudice.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Trickler

3. “so connected in time[,] place and circumstances and means employed that other conduct completes the picture ... or constitutes proof of the history of the crime charged.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Trickler