Lowe v. Ring’s Empirical Analysis
1900
Citation profile
1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 1924
1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Corinne Mill, Canal & Stock Co. v. Toponce · Mygatt v. . Wilcox · Bartlett v. Mystic River Corp. · Davis v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where services are rendered to a corporation by one of its officers, which are clearly outside of his official duties, a recovery may be had therefor under implied contract, if the circumstances be such as to fairly imply that it was expected that the services were to be paid for.” Lowe v. Ring, 106 Wis. 647 , 82 N. W. 571 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lowe v. Ring
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.