106 Wis. 2d 1 - State v. Kaye’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently February 2013 · most notably 227 Wis. 2d 758 - State v. Erickson (1999), 109 Wis. 2d 224 - State v. Fencl (1982)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cuyler v. Sullivan · Holloway v. Arkansas · 87 Wis. 2d 253 - State v. Koller · State v. Olsen · 84 Wis. 2d 11 - State v. Medrano
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The defendant must show by clear and convincing evidence that an actual conflict of interest existed; it is not sufficient that he show that a mere possibility or suspicion that a conflict could arise under hypothetical circumstances.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The court should inquire of the defendants and their attorney at the arraignment as to the possibility for actual conflicts of interest. The judge should ensure that the defendants understand the potential conflicts and determine whether they want separate counsel.. . . [T]his determination [to allow representation] should not be made unless it is clear the defendants have made a voluntary and knowing waiver of their right to separate counsel.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“actual conflict of interest adversely affected his lawyer's performance.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.