106 Wis. 2d 624 - State Ex Rel. Funmaker v. Klamm’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably 121 Wis. 2d 389 - State v. Dunn (1984), 111 Wis. 2d 175 - In Matter of EB (1983)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Coleman v. Alabama · Herring v. New York · 104 Wis. 2d 15 - State v. Williams · 40 Wis. 2d 223 - State Ex Rel. Evanow v. Seraphim · 62 Wis. 2d 577 - State Ex Rel. Hussong v. Froelich
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when there exists a believable or plausible account of the defendant's commission of a felony.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““. . . The reviewing court can examine the evidence only sufficiently to discover whether there was any substantial ground for the exercise of j udgment by the committing magistrate. When the reviewing court has discovered that there is competent evidence for the judicial mind of the examining magistrate to act on in determining the existence of the essential facts, it has reached the limit of its jurisdiction and cannot go beyond that and weigh the evidence.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he constitution does not require that counsel be allowed to play the same role [at a preliminary examination] as counsel at trial. A counsel's role is necessarily limited by the limited scope of the preliminary examination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.