Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

107 Ala. 1

Hayes v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1894

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1894-11-15

Tried before the Hon. J. M. Carmichael, The appellant, Starling Hayes, was indicted and tried for grand larceny.

Relies on Waller v. State · Cook v. State · Ned v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1894-11-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 1984

13 state decisions

401894190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BRICKELL, O. J.

¶1The writing the jury delivered to the clerk during the recess of the court, was in no proper sense a verdict. In all cases of felony, the verdict of the jury can be pronounced or rendered only in open court, in the presence of the judge and of the defendant. 1 Bish. Or. Proc., § 1001; State v. Hughes, 2 Ala. 102 ; Waller v. State, 40 Ala. 325 ; Cook v The State, 60 Ala. 39; Jones v. State, 97 Ala. 77 ; Jackson v. State, 102 Ala. 76. The court should not have recognized the writing as of any force. If after their voluntary dispersion, a'nd their reassemblage under the order of the court, the jurors had been remitted to their deliberations, and had returned a verdict into court, it may be, the illegality and irregularity of their conduct would have been only ground for new trial. But this course was not pursued ; the writing was received as a verdict, and the jury discharged. When the jury are sworn and the trial is entered upon; the prisoner is placed in'jeopardy, and the unauthorized discharge of the jury, without a verdict, is the equivalent of an acquittal. — Ned v. The *5State, 7 Port. 187 ; Cook v. State, supra; Jones v. State, supra ; Jackson v. State, supra.

¶2The judgment must be reversed, and as the discharge of the jury operated au acquittal, that judgment must be here entered.

/107/ala/1 · .json · Public domain