Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 Ariz. 283 - Edwards v. Young

Edwards v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
2
states following
March 2020
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 83 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably City of Phoenix v. Geyler (1985), United Bank of Arizona v. Allyn (1990)

2 federal appellate · 83 state decisions

280197119801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thompson v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Murphey v. Gray · Pierre v. Jordan · Burney v. Lee · Jenney v. Arizona Express, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Although this holding may create some hardship as in the instant case, the rule is clear and we take it as we find it. In general, opposing parties have their rights too, and one of them is to feel secure in the knowledge that they are finally freed from the burdens of a suit. They cannot do this as long as a case may be re-opened because of allegedly ‘unique circumstances’ occurring after the time for appeal has passed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““We are convinced that where, as here, the rules of civil procedure specifically recognize that the time for filing of a motion for a new trial may not be enlarged, the efficacy of the rule depends upon the willingness of the courts to enforce it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`It is settled in Arizona that the perfecting of an appeal within the time prescribed is jurisdictional; and, hence, where the appeal is not timely filed, the appellate court acquires no jurisdiction other than to dismiss the attempted appeal.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.