Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

107 Ariz. 300

486 P.2d 782

State v. Howell

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1971

Arizona Supreme Court · decided 1971-06-29

Applies AZ 12 § 12-120.21

Relies on Atlantic Corp. v. United States · Gardner v. Gardner

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1971-06-29

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2009

16 state decisions

801971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

STRUCKMEYER, Chief Justice.

¶1In this criminal appeal, Anthony Wayne Howell was informed against in the Superior Court of Maricopa County, Arizona, for robbery, Count 1, and assault with a deadly weapon, Count 2, to which charges he pleaded not guilty. Robbery is punishable by imprisonment for not less than five years. A.R.S. § 13-643. On November 19, 1970, the State filed an amended information for grand theft from the person, a felony, accompanied by a stipulation in these words:

“It is hereby stipulated by defendant and his counsel that this amended information is filed without objection for the purpose of entering a plea of guilty; it is further stipulated that if at a subsequent time this plea be withdrawn for any reason, this information may be re-amended without objection to allege the charge contained in the original information.”

¶2The stipulation was signed by the defendant, by the public defender and a deputy county attorney. To the amended charge, defendant entered a plea of guilty. He was sentenced on the sixth day of January 1971 to imprisonment for not less than six nor more than eight years to date from the time of his arrest, August 1970.

¶3Thereafter, the defendant filed a notice of appeal directed to the Court of Appeals, Division One, State of Arizona, appealing from the judgment and sentence pronounced upon him. On May 28, 1971, the Clerk of the Court of Appeals, being of the opinion that because the original information charging robbery carried a possible sentence of life imprisonment and because if defendant obtained a reversal, upon return to the Superior Court the former information might be reinstated, whereupon the criminal action would involve crimes over which the Court of Appeals has' no jurisdiction, caused the record to be transmitted to the Clerk of this Court, where it. was docketed as Criminal Cause 2327.

¶4The jurisdiction and venue of the Court of Appeals is provided by A.R.S., § 12-120.21. Subsection A reads:

“A. The court of appeals shall have:
1. Appellate jurisdiction in all actions and proceedings originating in or permitted by law to be appealed from the superior court, except criminal actions involving crimes punishable by death or life inprisonment.” (Emphasis added.)

¶5Jurisdiction depends upon the state of affairs existing at the time it is invoked, Gardner v. Gardner, 253 S.C. 296, 170 S.E.2d 372, and once having attached is not lost by subsequent events. Atlantic Corporation v. United States, 1 Cir., 311 F.2d 907. Under the Arizona enactment A.R.S. § 12-120.21, jurisdiction is dependent upon the punishment which is to be imposed under the charge.

¶6The Clerk of this Court is ordered to transmit to the Clerk of the Court of Ap*302peals, Division One, the record in this cause, with directions that it be entered upon the files of that court for disposition according to law.

HAYS, V. C. J., and UDALL and LOCKWOOD, JJ., concur.
/107/ariz/300 · .json · Public domain