State v. Sample’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2017 · most notably Mincey v. Arizona (1978), State v. Gretzler (1980)
3 federal appellate · 36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Chimel v. California · Escobedo v. Illinois · Ker v. State of California · United States v. Rabinowitz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * The traditional right of citizens to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures and unreasonable and unnecessary invasions of their privacy is not violated when the premises upon which a deceased victim is found are searched without a warrant. The need for all citizens and particularly potential victims such as this to effective protection from crime, particularly while in their own home, would indicate that a warrantless search of the premises is not made unreasonable or unconstitutional by the fact that the defendant exercises joint control over the premises. * * * ” State v. Sample, 107 Ariz. 407, 410 , 489 P.2d 44, 47 (1971).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Lewisohn · State v. Duke““A. A person who has been convicted in any court without this state of an offense which, if committed within this state, would be punishable by the laws of this state * '* * shall be punished for any subsequent crime committed within this state in the manner prescribed by 13-1649 * * *.” (Emphasis added.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““I believe a fair resume of the testimony is that the defendant’s condition remained nervous and upset throughout the day. However, again I believe the defendant was aware he was at the police station, that he was in custody. And I believe that both of these statements are voluntary and will be admitted.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.