Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 Ariz. 68 - State v. Contreras

State v. Contreras’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
states following
December 1993
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently December 1993 · most notably State v. Clabourne (1984), State v. Gerlaugh (1982)

40 state decisions

280197119801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Schroeder · Antone v. State of Arizona · State v. Madden · State v. Prewitt · State of Arizona v. Myers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The record reveals there was sufficient evidence of defendant’s state of intoxication at the time of the homicide to present a question of fact for the jury as to whether defendant was capable of entertaining a malicious intent or the malice aforethought required for conviction of second-degree murder. The trial court, therefore, properly instructed the jury as to the possible verdict of manslaughter.” State v. Contreras, 107 Ariz. 68, 69-70 , 481 P.2d 861, 863 (1971).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““While an assault and battery are always included in an unlawful homicide, they are not degrees of such offense requiring the court where death results to instruct that the defendant may be found guilty thereof.” State v. Myers, 59 Ariz. 200, 208 , 125 P.2d 441, 444 (1942).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.