Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 CALAPP3D 976 - People v. Reyes

People v. Reyes’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 1982
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · 26 Cal. 3d 498 - People v. Sage · 25 Cal. 3d 260 - People v. Ramirez · People v. Manson · 25 Cal. 3d 223 - People v. Saffell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “June 7, 1979—Medical director certified under section 6325, subdivision (b) that defendant “will not benefit by further care and treatment in the hospital.” (Original reflects copies mailed to defendant, his attorney of record and the district attorney.) June 18, 1979—“Order For Return After Indeterminate Commitment” issued. (Original reflects a copy mailed to defendant’s attorney.) June 27, 1979—“Order For Transportation” for defendant’s psychiatric examination on June 28 by two court-appointed psychiatrists and for delivery to court on July 5, 1979 for hearing. July 5, 1979—Defendant appeared in court. Hearing continued to July 12, 1979. July 9, 1979—Defendant’s counsel obtained order for psychiatric examination of his client. July 10, 1979—Defendant examined by psychiatrist pursuant to order of July 9, 1979. July 11, 1979—Defendant’s examining psychiatrist prepared report for defendant’s lawyer (Evid. Code, § 1014). (The report indicates the psychiatrist reviewed (1) the psychiatric evaluation from another psychiatrist dated November 28, 1977, (2) probation officer’s report for hearing on January 12, 1978, (3) forensic evaluations of court-appointed psychiatrist of January 18, 1978, and June 28, 1979, and (4) Patton State Hospital summary of June 5, 1979.) July 12, 1979—Court hearing. (It was at this hearing that pursuant to stipulation the court-appointed psychiatrists’ reports were received in evidence and where defendant called an independent witness to testify on his b”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.