Train v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
107 F. 261 · 1900
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
March 1931
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In these circumstances I concur in the opinion of the Board of General Appraisers that the practical uses of the goods for purposes of manufacture, other than conversion into paper, are so relatively substantial and significant as to take the goods out of their former classification. [Italics ours.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.