Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 F.1d 41 - Tootle v. Coleman

Tootle v. Coleman’s Empirical Analysis

107 F. 41 · 1901

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
March 1963
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 1963

4 federal appellate · 3 district ·

601901191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lovejoy v. Murray · New York Co v. Estill · Chicago Ry Co v. Sturm · Wyman v. United States · Cowley v. Northern Pacific Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““One who instigates another to do a wrongful act, and, when the wrongdoer is sued, takes upon himself and conducts the defense of the case, is concluded from again litigating with the plaintiff in that action the issues there decided.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.