Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 F.1d 80 - In re Ratliff

In re Ratliff’s Empirical Analysis

107 F. 80 · 1901

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
April 1922
most recently cited

3 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Clark Assignee v. Iselin · Columbus Electric Co. v. Worden · In re Eggert · In re Alexander · Worden v. Columbus Electric Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““That when a payment on account is made to an innocent creditor, in the due course of business, within four- months of bankruptcy, when the debtor did not know he was insolvent, such payment is not a preference which must be surrendered as a condition precedent to allowing proof of claim. This seems to be the proper, reasonable construction of the statute, the purpose of which was to provide for an equitable distribution of the bankrupt estate; to promote, and not destroy, business, and benefit, not punish, innocent creditors as well as bankrupts.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.