Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 107 F.1d 89 - In re Page

In re Page’s Empirical Analysis

107 F. 89 · 1901

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
April 2001
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2001

4 federal appellate ·

3019011910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sparhawk v. Yerkes · Hyde v. Woods · Weaver v. Fisher · Pancoast v. Gowen · In re Ketchum

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “possibly affected the value of the seat for the purposes of sale, but, while restricting, did not destroy its transferability.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.