Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

107 F.2d 1013

Docket No. 9287.

Foster v. United States

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Dec. 11, 1939.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1939-12-11

2 counsel of record

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1939-12-11

¶1Felix T. Smith, of San Francisco, Cal., and Oscar Lawler, of Los Angeles, Cal. (Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, of San Francisco, Cal., and Lawler, Felix & Hall, of Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for appellants.

¶2Joseph E. Brill, M. S. Huberman, Henry McClernan, Robert H. Marquis, Laurence P. Sherfy, Charles S. Burdell, and A. Andrew Hauk, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for appellee.

¶3Before WILBUR, DENMAN, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5It appearing that the appeal in above entitled cause has become moot, it is ordered that the appeal be dismissed, that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court in this cause issued forthwith.

/107/f2d/1013 · .json · Public domain